Victory over Turkey and Iran—the architects of a radical, global, Islamic (Shiite-Sunni) political axis in the Middle East—now awaits the formation of a new government in Israel: a unity government featuring a rotation between Gadi Eisenkot and Benjamin Netanyahu . Why a rotation? To signal that the time for internal Israeli cooperation has arrived, and that it must be given an appropriate formal structure. Furthermore, the internal disintegration—a direct consequence of the policies pursued by the government of zealots—also awaits such a government. It will not mend these rifts through empty apologies; rather, it will do so by involving all Israelis in substantive political processes—focusing on the actual substance of the issues (see further elaboration in today’s editorial) rather than on partisan political maneuvering. And why is a Netanyahu-Eisenkot government well-suited for this? Because there is no fundamental difference between the Likud’s regional outlook and the views held by Eisenkot, Bennett, and Golan. All other differences are minor—certainly not the kind of fuel that could ignite a terminal social fracture. At this moment, there is a universal desire among Israelis for all-encompassing cooperation. This is also the government that will have to contend with the root causes of Turkey’s sudden resurgence—a resurgence positioning it to split the world by establishing a third, Islamic pole (a development we have been describing and analyzing for years, and which is now being vindicated by the evidence). The United States has grown weary of the Middle East—a region where it consistently loses—yet it remains determined to emerge victorious in this incorrigible part of the world. To this end, Trump has earmarked Turkey, believing it possesses the capacity to "pull the chestnuts out of the fire" on his behalf. Trump understands that his strategic shift—redefining American interests—also aligns with the emerging sentiment in the U.S. that is increasingly critical of Israel; in doing so, he kills two birds with one stone. It should be noted here that, in our assessment, the root of the animosity toward Israel stems from a single, consequential action by Benjamin Netanyahu: his decision to defy the foundations of American political culture by addressing both houses of the U.S. Congress, effectively bypassing the President. No nation appreciates having its political culture mocked—certainly not the American people, who, since the First World War, have grown accustomed to viewing themselves as the sole, singular power in a fractured world. While this is less true today—as a "second world," led by China, develops rapidly—Trump’s America operates under the belief that if it simply repeats the narrative of its own global hegemony—anchored by its superior goods and technology—that narrative will somehow become reality. In our view, this is an American miscalculation. It would be wiser to acknowledge this shift and forge closer ties with Europe and Canada to navigate it. Similarly, the pursuit of a close relationship with Turkey is a mistake. Turkey is a regional power with a long, imperial political tradition; sooner or later, it will spurn the American hand extended toward it. This is precisely why Israel requires unity governments in the coming generation—so that when America eventually returns to being our closest ally, it will find a wise government here, one capable of welcoming these "returnees" without anger or resentment, and embracing them with a humble heart.