So you can evaluate our 2nd theory, i basic recoded, for each and every of the items on the position level, the newest part of answers that let you know if husbands have less, equal or higher scores, particularly, standing, having hypogamy, and therefore husbands has actually lower status than simply spouses, homogamy, meaning equal standing, and you will hypergamy, meaning husbands with highest reputation than wives. Towards possible organization off nation, analyses was indeed tall for the knowledge (X dos =eleven.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you can economic effect out-of a possible breakup (X dos =9.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Investigation indicated that, to possess Foreign language professionals, there is a whole lot more knowledge hypogamy, whereas getting Dominican professionals you will find more training homogamy. Towards financial situations in the eventuality of split up, because there is a whole lot more homogamy for Foreign-language participants, discover a whole lot more hypergamy to have Dominicans (get a hold of Profile step one).
Having previous marriages or otherwise not was not associated so you can differences in condition. Towards possible association between reputation and you may many years partnered, high relationships was basically used in health (X 2 =14.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), and while to possess people y is available (forty.4%, each), to own lovers y is present (43.4%). This means, for the classification with more age married, husbands possess straight down fitness position. That have people of previous marriages and having people from most recent relationships failed to somewhat apply to position.
Within the contribution, brand new analyses concerning the second theory indicated that as opposed to our very own criterion, the greatest feature related so you can condition 's the nation.
Univariate screening shown extreme variations in basis step 1 (F=5
To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three hoe amino-account te verwijderen types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).
Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks' Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.
In the long run, hypogamy activities within the Spain scored notably less than hypogamy activities from inside the Dominican Republic
Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks' Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.
Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks' Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).